Workshop Description
Automotive faces a quantum agenda with two distinct but interconnected halves. On the opportunity side, quantum computing promises competitive advantage in battery chemistry simulation (where classical DFT calculations hit scaling walls for lithium-sulphur and solid-state cathode candidates), route optimisation (QAOA for fleet logistics), and potentially autonomous driving perception (quantum machine learning for sensor fusion, though this remains speculative on NISQ hardware). Volkswagen, BMW, and Toyota have all published quantum computing partnerships. On the obligation side, UNECE WP.29 R155 has required a cybersecurity management system as a type approval condition since July 2024. R156 governs software update management. ISO/SAE 21434 places vulnerability management obligations on OEMs that extend to supply chain cryptographic risk. TISAX affects supplier information security assessments. A CISO who understands only the security side will miss the competitive window. A CTO who understands only the computing side will miss the compliance deadlines.
This briefing presents both sides to a non-technical executive audience. No physics background is required. The session covers which quantum computing use cases in automotive are nearest to production readiness and which remain speculative, what the regulatory obligations actually require and by when, what peer OEMs and tier-1 suppliers are investing in, and how to structure a quantum programme that addresses both opportunity and obligation without over-committing to speculative capability. Participants leave with a dual-agenda investment framework, a board reporting template, and a regulatory checklist covering UNECE, ISO/SAE 21434, and TISAX jurisdictional requirements.
What participants cover
- Quantum computing use cases nearest to production: battery chemistry simulation, QAOA for fleet logistics, quantum ML for sensor fusion (with honest NISQ assessment)
- Post-quantum security obligations: UNECE WP.29 R155/R156 type approval, ISO/SAE 21434 vulnerability management, TISAX supplier assessment
- Competitive intelligence: Volkswagen, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Toyota quantum programmes, tier-1 supplier cryptographic agility roadmaps
- Vendor landscape: which quantum computing providers target automotive and what is credible versus speculative
- CISO versus CTO ownership model: who leads quantum security, who leads quantum computing, and where the programmes overlap
- Board governance: structuring a dual-agenda quantum programme, investment sequencing, and reporting to non-technical governance committees