Workshop Description
For energy forecasting teams and grid operators. Covers quantum machine learning for wind and solar output prediction, quantum optimisation for grid balancing and storage dispatch, benchmark-specific performance comparisons against classical methods, and honest assessment of NISQ hardware limits for forecasting workloads.
Wind and solar output forecasting is fundamentally a high-dimensional time-series problem. Classical approaches (numerical weather prediction, ARIMA, LSTM networks) perform well for 1-6 hour horizons but degrade as the number of correlated input features (wind speed, temperature, humidity, pressure, cloud cover across multiple grid points) grows. Quantum machine learning offers a structurally different approach: variational quantum circuits and quantum kernel methods can represent correlations in high-dimensional feature spaces that are expensive to capture classically. Published results from IBM, Pasqal, and several academic groups show that on specific meteorological datasets, QML models match or slightly exceed classical baselines at 10-40 qubit scales. The open question is whether this advantage persists as problem size grows, and whether the data infrastructure typical of energy companies can support quantum-enhanced pipelines. This workshop maps that boundary for your forecasting portfolio.
What participants cover
- Classical forecasting limits: where NWP, ARIMA, and LSTM networks plateau on high-dimensional renewable energy prediction problems
- Quantum machine learning architectures: VQCs, quantum kernel estimation (QKE), and quantum reservoir computing applied to meteorological time-series data
- Grid balancing optimisation: QAOA and quantum annealing for unit commitment, economic dispatch, and battery storage scheduling under renewable intermittency
- Benchmark evidence: published results comparing QML against classical ML on energy forecasting datasets at current NISQ hardware scales
- Hardware limits: the NISQ performance ceiling for forecasting (10-40 qubit feature maps with noise mitigation) and fault-tolerant timeline for utility-scale problems
- Vendor assessment: independent comparison of IBM Qiskit, Pasqal, Xanadu PennyLane, D-Wave, and quantum-inspired classical alternatives for energy workloads