Workshop Description
For urban planning teams and city digital twin architects. Covers quantum-enhanced agent-based modelling for population mobility simulation, QAOA for land use zoning optimisation, and QML for digital twin predictive analytics. Includes honest NISQ assessments against MATSim, Gurobi, and classical ML baselines.
Urban planning simulation involves three computational bottlenecks where quantum approaches are being explored. Agent-based models (MATSim, SUMO) simulate population movement and commuter flows, but scaling beyond 100,000 agents with realistic decision functions strains classical compute. Quantum machine learning offers parameterised circuits as surrogate models for agent behaviour, though current NISQ devices limit this to roughly 20-50 qubit circuits. Land use zoning is a combinatorial optimisation problem: allocating density, green space, and infrastructure across precincts subject to transport accessibility and population targets. QAOA can address small instances (50-100 variables) but Gurobi and simulated annealing handle production-scale zoning problems today. Digital twin predictive analytics (energy demand, water usage, traffic flow) benefit from quantum circuit expressibility for multi-modal sensor data, though gradient boosting and LSTM models remain competitive on current benchmarks. This workshop works through all three areas with specific formulations, runs benchmark-specific performance comparisons, and maps the timeline for quantum advantage in each use case.
What participants cover
- Quantum-enhanced agent-based modelling: parameterised quantum circuits as surrogate models for agent decision functions in population mobility simulation
- QAOA for land use optimisation: zoning allocation, infrastructure placement, and density targets formulated as QUBO problems with transport accessibility constraints
- QML for digital twin analytics: VQC architectures for energy demand, water usage, and traffic flow prediction from multi-modal city sensor feeds
- NISQ limitations: qubit counts, circuit depth, and noise levels that determine which urban planning problems fit on near-term hardware (50-100 qubits)
- Classical baselines: benchmark-specific performance comparisons against MATSim, Gurobi, gradient boosting, and LSTM on matched urban planning instances
- Hybrid workflows: inserting quantum subroutines into CityGML and FIWARE NGSI-LD digital twin pipelines alongside classical HPC simulation